Followers

Saturday, August 23, 2025

Platform Deep Dive: Magic School, SchoolAI, FlintK12 and StudyHallAI

Here are Jasper and Robert discussing edtech

Introduction

The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence necessitates a focused review of emerging educational technology platforms. Choosing among these platforms is a daunting task for any teacher or school leadership team, but failing to stay up to date may lead to a decline in the relevance of the programs offered, and eventually in the quality of education.

This analysis concentrates on three prominent, recently developed AI-native platforms—MagicSchool.ai, SchoolAI.com, FlintK12.com and StudyHallAI—as they represent a significant shift away from traditional digital tools. These are fundamentally different from Learning Management Systems. Unlike retrofitted applications, these platforms are built from the ground up to leverage AI for core educational tasks. 


Thursday, August 21, 2025

From Theory to the Top Floor: A Deep Dive into High School Simulated Private Sector Board Meetings

From Theory to the Top Floor: A Deep Dive into High School Simulated Private Sector Board Meetings

Ever wondered who is the CEO's boss? Well it is the corporate board, that sets the strategy and therefore is the responsible for the long-term competitiveness of the company. Until recently, business management was taught without much attention for the corporate board. If however the objectives of these programs is to teach business comprehensively, including the drivers of competitiveness this is a mistake that must be corrected.

Today, high school business and economics classrooms are transforming into dynamic corporate boardrooms, moving far beyond textbook theories of supply and demand. Through sophisticated simulations and experiential learning programs, students are now stepping into the roles of CEOs and board members, making high-stakes decisions that mirror the complexities of the real-world private sector. This report explores the landscape of these programs, their structure, the critical skills they impart, and the vital partnerships that bring the boardroom to the classroom.

Experiential learning has become a cornerstone of modern business education, with a strong emphasis on providing students with hands-on opportunities to apply their knowledge.¹ Simulated private sector board meetings are at the forefront of this educational evolution, offering a risk-free yet highly engaging environment for students to grapple with the challenges of corporate governance and strategic management.

The Rise of the Simulated Boardroom

The core idea behind these simulations is to bridge the gap between abstract business concepts and their practical application. By taking on roles within a simulated company, students are no longer passive recipients of information but active participants in the decision-making process. This "learning-by-doing" approach has been shown to increase student engagement, knowledge retention, and overall employability.², ³, ⁴, ⁵

These programs are offered in various formats, from in-class, project-based learning activities to large-scale international competitions. They often leverage specialized software that creates a dynamic and competitive market environment.

Key Players and Program Structures

Several organizations and program models are instrumental in bringing these simulated experiences to high school students:

  • DECA and FBLA: These career and technical student organizations are leaders in providing competitive business simulations for high school students. DECA's competitive events, for instance, include role-plays and case studies where students are given a business problem and must present a solution to a judge acting as a senior manager or board member.⁸ Their Virtual Business Challenge allows students to operate a web-based business simulation, competing against others in areas like entrepreneurship, finance, and marketing.¹⁰ FBLA also focuses on academic competitions and leadership development, with a strong emphasis on entrepreneurship and teamwork.⁹
  • Junior Achievement (JA): A global non-profit, JA has a long history of providing entrepreneurship education, having been founded in 1919. Its flagship "JA Company Program®" was its first program, offered to high school students on an after-school basis. A key component of this program is the election of a board of directors from among their peers, who are then responsible for the company's strategic direction.¹¹
  • Virtual Enterprise International (VEI): This program creates an in-school, global business simulation where classrooms are transformed into offices and students into business professionals. Students develop and manage their own virtual businesses, gaining expertise in problem-solving, decision-making, and collaboration in a global context.
  • University-Led Summer Programs: Many top business schools offer summer programs for high school students that incorporate experiential learning and simulations. For example, Babson College's Summer Study program immerses students in their "Entrepreneurial Thought & Action®" methodology, where they develop solutions to real-world problems. Similarly, programs at institutions like Fordham University and the University of California, Berkeley, have students develop business ideas and pitch them to panels of experts. Washington University's Gateway to Business program even includes an experiential learning project for a real-world client.
  • Classroom-Based Simulations: Outside the USA there is not much. Beyond these formal programs, many educators create their own simulated board meetings and business scenarios. This blog published an article in 2025 on how to run simulations in the classroom, and which platforms and tools to use.

The Anatomy of a Simulation

While the specifics vary, most private sector board meeting simulations share a common structure:

  1. Team Formation and Role Assignment: Students typically work in teams, with each member taking on a specific executive role, such as CEO, CFO, or Marketing Director. In programs like the JA Company Programme, students formally elect their board of directors.¹¹
  2. Strategic Decision-Making: The core of the simulation involves making a series of decisions over several rounds or "quarters." These decisions often revolve around key business functions like pricing, production levels, marketing budgets, and research and development investments.
  3. Performance Analysis: After each round, teams receive feedback in the form of financial statements, market share reports, and other key performance indicators. They must then analyze these results to understand the consequences of their decisions.
  4. Reporting and Presentation: A crucial element is reporting back to a "board of directors" or "shareholders," often played by the instructor, community volunteers, or judges in a competition setting. This can involve creating business plans, annual reports, and formal presentations.⁴

Learning Outcomes: Forging Future Business Leaders

The educational benefits of these simulations are extensive and well-documented.², ³, ⁴, ⁵, ⁷

  • Practical Skill Development: Students gain hands-on experience in financial management, market research, and strategic planning. They learn to read financial statements, manage budgets, and understand the interplay between different business functions.⁷
  • Enhanced Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving: The dynamic nature of the simulations forces students to think critically, analyze complex data, and adapt their strategies in response to changing market conditions and competitor actions.³, ⁴
  • Development of Soft Skills: Working in teams to run a company fosters crucial soft skills like communication, collaboration, negotiation, and leadership. Students learn to make decisions as a group, resolve conflicts, and present their ideas persuasively.³, ⁴, ⁷
  • Financial Literacy: By managing virtual companies, students gain a deep understanding of financial concepts like profit, expenses, and budgeting, which are often missing from traditional education.¹, ³, ⁷
  • Entrepreneurial Mindset: These simulations encourage an entrepreneurial way of thinking, teaching students about risk-taking, resilience, and innovation in a safe environment.³, ⁷

The Power of Partnership and Real-World Connection

The most effective programs often involve partnerships with the local business community. When industry professionals act as volunteer mentors, guest speakers, or judges for competitions, they bring a level of authenticity and real-world insight that cannot be replicated in the classroom alone.³ These interactions also provide students with valuable networking opportunities and career exposure.

Some schools take experiential learning a step further by facilitating student-run businesses that serve the school or local community. These enterprises, which can range from in-school cafes to manufacturing services, provide students with direct experience in all aspects of running a business, from operations and finance to customer service.

Conclusion: A Sound Investment in the Future

Simulated private sector board meetings and the broader category of business simulations represent a paradigm shift in how economics and business are taught at the high school level. By placing students in the driver's seat of a company, these programs demystify the corporate world and provide a powerful, engaging, and effective way to learn. They equip students not just with theoretical knowledge, but with the practical skills, critical thinking abilities, and collaborative mindset necessary to succeed in the global economy.³, ⁴, ⁵ As these immersive experiences become more integrated into curricula, they are shaping a new generation of confident, capable, and business-savvy leaders.


Endnotes

¹ Toronto District School Board. "Business and Experiential Learning." Accessed September 29, 2025.

² Virtonomics. "Here are 6 reasons why business simulation games benefit students." Accessed September 29, 2025.

³ Cesim Team. "Empowering high school education through business simulations." Cesim, December 11, 2024.

⁴ Cadotte, Ernie. "Simulations Spark Engagement and Real Learning." AACSB, September 7, 2022.

⁵ Cesim. "How Business Simulations Benefit Secondary Education." Accessed September 29, 2025.

⁶ Lalley and Miller (2007), as cited in Cesim, "How Business Simulations Benefit Secondary Education." Accessed September 29, 2025.

⁷ Cesim. "Secondary Education Business Simulations Benefits | Cesim." Accessed September 29, 2025.

⁸ DECA Inc. "Competitive Events | High School | DECA Inc." Accessed September 29, 2025.

⁹ Tuinei, Spencer. "DECA and FBLA: Nurturing Business Leaders in Our School District." Provo City School District, February 7, 2024.

¹⁰ Hamilton-Wenham Regional High School. "DECA - High School." Accessed September 29, 2025.

¹¹ Junior Achievement Dallas. "JA About – Junior Achievement Dallas Business Hall of Fame." Accessed September 29, 2025.

Saturday, July 12, 2025

The Six-Week Secret: How AI Is Giving Teachers Their Time Back


Summary of Key Points

  • ⏰ The AI Dividend: The headline finding is that teachers who use AI tools at least weekly are saving an average of 5.9 hours of work time per week. [1] Over a school year, this adds up to the equivalent of six full work weeks. [1]
  • 📈 Widespread but Uneven Adoption: A majority of K-12 teachers (60%) have already used an AI tool in their work during the 2024-25 school year. [2] However, only about a third (32%) are frequent, weekly users who reap the biggest time-saving benefits. [3]
  • ✅ Not Just Faster, But Better: Most teachers who use AI report that it improves the quality of their work. [1] This includes creating better-modified materials for student needs (64%), generating higher-quality insights from student data (61%), and improving the quality of their grading and feedback (57%). [2]
  • 🤔 A Call for Leadership and Policy: A major gap exists in official guidance. Only 19% of teachers report that their school has a formal policy on AI use. [4] This is critical because schools with a policy see a 26% greater "AI dividend" in time saved.
  • 🧑‍🏫 Empowerment Over Replacement: The overwhelming sentiment is that AI is a tool to augment and support teachers, not replace them. [5][6] It automates tedious administrative tasks, freeing up educators to focus on high-impact, human-centric work like personalized instruction and building student relationships. [7][8]

Beyond Burnout: New Report Reveals AI's Power to Fix Teacher Workload

Introduction: A Glimmer of Hope in the Teacher Burnout Crisis

The narrative around the teaching profession in recent years has been one of crisis. Educators are facing immense pressure: staggering workloads, the challenge of catching students up academically, and persistent burnout that threatens the stability of our schools. Teachers report working 50-hour weeks on average, with many feeling underpaid and overwhelmed. It’s a relentless cycle that leaves little room for the very things that make teaching magical: creativity, personalized connection, and the joy of seeing a student’s eyes light up with understanding.



Sunday, June 29, 2025

From Classroom Panic to Career Anxiety: How AI is Reshaping Our Future

 

Summary of Key Findings

  • 🎓 Student-Faculty AI Gap: While students are eager to use AI, 65% believe they know more than their instructors, who often feel "hesitant and overwhelmed."
  • 😟 Faculty Concerns: Academic integrity is the top concern for 82% of higher-ed instructors, followed by worries about AI accuracy and a lack of training.
  • 壓力 A "Police State of Writing": The pressure to catch AI misuse is creating a stressful environment, leading to burnout for both students and educators.
  • 🤖 Workplace Anxiety: Tech CEOs are now openly admitting that AI will reduce white-collar jobs, causing significant "AI anxiety" regarding job security and relevance.
  • unprepared The Graduation Gap: A staggering 55% of recent graduates feel their academic programs did not prepare them to use generative AI tools, leaving them feeling unprepared for the modern workplace.
  • 🤝 The Human Element: Experts in both education and the corporate world emphasize that the path forward involves focusing on irreplaceable human skills like emotional intelligence (EQ), critical thinking, and creativity.

The Great Disconnect: Why Education's AI Hesitation is Fueling Workplace Anxiety

Introduction: The Two Faces of the AI Revolution

Artificial intelligence is no longer a far-off concept from science fiction; it is a pervasive force reshaping our daily lives. From the way we learn to the way we work, AI's integration has been swift and disruptive. This rapid change has created a fascinating and deeply concerning paradox. On one side, we have a generation of students who are digital natives, quick to adopt and experiment with tools like ChatGPT. On the other, we have the institutions—both educational and corporate—that are struggling to keep pace, creating a chasm of anxiety, unpreparedness, and overwhelm.





Are We Failing Our Students? Closing the AI Skills Gap Before It's Too Late

 

Summary of Key Points

  • 🎓 Student Enthusiasm: Students have rapidly adopted AI, using it for learning and brainstorming, and feel they know more about it than their instructors.
  • 🤔 Faculty Hesitation: Educators are cautious and overwhelmed, with major concerns about academic integrity (82%), accuracy, and lack of training, despite seeing AI's potential.
  • 🤖 The Readiness Gap: A significant disconnect exists where graduates feel unprepared for the AI-powered workplace, with 55% stating their education didn't equip them with necessary AI skills.
  • 🚀 Untapped Potential: AI's greatest promise lies in personalizing education, amplifying instructors' abilities, and boosting student engagement, but this requires institutional support.
  • 💼 The Clear Payoff: Graduates with AI training report significant career benefits, including greater job stability, higher salaries, and faster promotions.

AI in the Classroom: Navigating the Tensions Between Potential and Preparedness

Part 1: The New Digital Disruption

Artificial intelligence is no longer a far-off concept from science fiction; it's a daily reality embedded in how we work, communicate, and learn. In the world of education, this transformation has been particularly swift and disruptive. The conversation around AI often swings between two extremes: a utopian vision where AI solves every educational challenge, or a dystopian one where it signals the end of academic integrity and critical thinking. However, as a recent Cengage Group report from June 2025 reveals, the reality on the ground is far more nuanced, filled with a complex mix of eagerness, anxiety, potential, and unpreparedness.




Wednesday, June 25, 2025

Ex-Google Recruiter Explains: Why Nobody Hires Older Workers (And How to Fix It) - YouTube

Summary

This Youtube video (https://bit.ly/overqualifieddralbert) addresses the pervasive issue of age bias that workers over 40 frequently encounter during job searches, specifically focusing on the subtle yet damaging use of the term “overqualified” by hiring managers. It highlights how these biases stem from unspoken fears and misconceptions, such as concerns about salary, adaptability, and longevity in a role. 

The speaker emphasizes that these are assumptions reflecting the insecurities of hiring managers rather than the actual capabilities of experienced candidates. Instead of hiding their experience, candidates over 40 should strategically reframe their skills and knowledge as valuable assets that bring unique benefits to potential employers. 

This involves proactively addressing biases during interviews, shifting the narrative around being “overqualified” to demonstrate readiness and cost-effectiveness, and showcasing adaptability by staying current with industry trends and technologies. The video offers practical examples of how to respond to common biased questions and suggests expanding job search strategies beyond traditional job boards by leveraging LinkedIn for genuine networking. 


Ultimately, the video empowers experienced professionals to take control of the interview narrative, positioning their experience as a solution rather than a liability, and encourages ongoing learning and strategic communication to overcome age discrimination in hiring.


Highlights

  • 🔑 The word “overqualified” is often a disguised form of age bias used against workers over 40.
  • 🤔 Hiring managers’ concerns about older candidates often reflect their own insecurities, not the candidate’s skills.
  • 🎯 Reframing extensive experience as a unique strength can turn perceived liabilities into advantages.
  • 💡 Proactively addressing biases in interviews builds confidence and shifts employer perceptions.
  • 🚀 Highlighting adaptability and continuous learning disproves myths about older candidates being out of touch.
  • 🌐 Leveraging LinkedIn for authentic networking can uncover hidden job opportunities beyond job boards.
  • 🛠️ Strategic preparation and clear communication empower experienced candidates to control the interview narrative.

Key Insights

  • 🔍 Age bias is often subtle and hidden behind coded language: Statements like “this is a fast-paced environment” or questions about how long a candidate plans to stay are often disguised forms of discrimination. These phrases are designed to question the suitability of older candidates without overtly stating age as a factor, making it harder for job seekers to identify and confront these biases. Recognizing this hidden language is the first step toward overcoming it.

Tuesday, June 24, 2025

ChatGPT in the Classroom: Promising Performance, Moderate Perceptions, and a Need for Caution

Summary of Key Points

  • 📊 The Study: A meta-analysis of 51 experimental studies on ChatGPT's impact in education, published between late 2022 and early 2025.
  • 📈 Learning Performance: The analysis found a large positive effect (Hedges’s g = 0.867) of ChatGPT on student learning performance. This effect was strongest in skills-based courses, in problem-based learning models, and when used for a duration of 4–8 weeks. [1][2] (Hedges' g is a statistical measure used to quantify the effect size, specifically the standardized mean difference between two groups.)
  • 🤔 Learning Perception & Higher-Order Thinking: The study reported moderately positive effects on both students' perception of learning (g = 0.456) and their development of higher-order thinking (g = 0.457). [1][2]
  • 🔬 Important Caveats: The authors explicitly state that the sample sizes for the perception and higher-order thinking analyses were small (19 and 9 studies, respectively), which calls for a cautious interpretation of these specific findings. [2]
  • 🧑‍🏫 Context Matters: The effectiveness of the tool is not uniform. It changes based on the course type, the teaching model, the duration of use, and the role assigned to the AI (e.g., tutor vs. partner). [1][2]


A Cautious Look at the Evidence on ChatGPT in Education

As educators and researchers, we are positioned directly on the front lines of a rapid technological shift. The integration of generative AI, specifically tools like ChatGPT, into our classrooms is no longer a future hypothetical; it is a present reality. The debate surrounding its utility, however, is often polarized, oscillating between utopian promises of personalized learning and dystopian fears of cognitive decline. Anecdotes abound, but robust evidence has been harder to come by.


Supercharging the Smile: How Generative AI is Reshaping Value Creation in Business and Education

  Executive Summary The "Smiling Curve," a model developed by Acer founder Stan Shih, illustrates that the highest economic value...